Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
Rev Med Interne ; 43(2): 75-81, 2022 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1500223

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The pandemic caused by SARS-COV-2 infection spread rapidly during the "first wave" through France between March and May 2020. It was responsible for high mortality in subjects with comorbidities and the elderly who lived in nursing homes. In May 2020, 75% of the deaths occurred in people over 75 years old in nursing homes. It is difficult to estimate accurately the prevalence of COVID-19 infection during this period because only 50% of the diagnoses in nursing homes were made by RT-PCR. During this period, the diagnosis was mainly based on the clinical symptoms. POPULATION AND METHODS: We carried out a prospective study among residents of the 27 EHPADs in the UNIVI group (SEROCOVID study) between August 31 and October 16, 2020 using rapid ELISA serotests carried out by pricking the fingertip. We looked for the seroprevalence by the use of rapid serotests as well as the overall prevalence by cumulating the positive results of the RT-PCR when done and of the rapid serotest. The secondary objectives were the study of risk factors for infection by multivariate analysis as well as the description of the symptoms that led to the diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 1145 residents were included aged on average 89±7.5 years old (female 78.7%). The time between the COVID-19 disease and the rapid inclusion serotest was on average 5±1.7 months. The prevalence estimated by the three diagnostic evaluation methods (medical diagnosis, RT-PCR or by rapid serotest ELISA) is about 14%, underestimated compared to the overall prevalence at 22.7%. The study of risk factors in multivariate analysis shows that the most dependent residents, living in a protected unit due to behavioral disorders or whose close contact with a person with COVID-19 had significantly higher rates of infection. Finally, the symptoms most frequently observed in residents differed from those in younger subjects with geriatric characteristics, such as the higher frequency of digestive symptoms and geriatric syndromes. Fever has only been observed in one third of cases in the elderly. Smell and taste disorders were seldom described. CONCLUSION: Our study provides an estimate of the overall prevalence as well as the mean seroprevalence of COVID-19 in EHPAD residents five months after the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease. The difference between the two estimates is probably explained by the frailty and decreased immunity of the nursing home residents. Therefore, it would need to be reactivated by vaccination of all residents, even those already infected with SARS-COV-2. These elements corroborate the governmental strategy of vaccination deployed in all residents of EHPAD regardless of their previous contact with the virus.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Nursing Homes , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Seroepidemiologic Studies
2.
Rev Mal Respir ; 38(6): 616-625, 2021 Jun.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1292251

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Since January 2020, when the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were diagnosed in France, pulmonologists have been at the heart of the crisis and should be responsible for the management of acute COVID-19 (and any possible sequelae) BACKGROUND: Many drugs have been evaluated or are currently under evaluation as possible specific treatment for SARS-CoV-2. Nevertheless, as of April 15, 2021, the only recommended treatment in current practice is the "standard of care", i.e. the symptomatic management of infection with SARS-CoV-2. This review presents the state of knowledge on COVID-19 in the acute phase (virological, immunological, epidemiological and therapeutic data) available on 15th April, 2021. OUTLOOK: A large number of clinical trials are currently ongoing. It is important to propose to patients the opportunity to participate in clinical trials and to structure the research in order to complete the studies. CONCLUSION: Current management is based on oxygen therapy, thromboprophylaxis and in some cases corticosteroids. No antiviral therapy is currently recommended. These data are constantly evolving.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/therapy , COVID-19/virology , Humans
3.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 114(5): 415-425, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1240130

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although cardiovascular comorbidities seem to be strongly associated with worse outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), data regarding patients with preexisting heart failure are limited. AIMS: To investigate the incidence, characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with COVID-19 with a history of heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction. METHODS: We performed an observational multicentre study including all patients hospitalized for COVID-19 across 24 centres in France from 26 February to 20 April 2020. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-hospital death or need for orotracheal intubation. RESULTS: Overall, 2809 patients (mean age 66.4±16.9years) were included. Three hundred and seventeen patients (11.2%) had a history of heart failure; among them, 49.2% had heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and 50.8% had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. COVID-19 severity at admission, defined by a quick sequential organ failure assessment score>1, was similar in patients with versus without a history of heart failure. Before and after adjustment for age, male sex, cardiovascular comorbidities and quick sequential organ failure assessment score, history of heart failure was associated with the primary endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-1.90; P=0.02). This result seemed to be mainly driven by a history of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HR: 1.61, 95% CI: 1.13-2.27; P=0.01) rather than heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HR: 1.19, 95% CI: 0.79-1.81; P=0.41). CONCLUSIONS: History of heart failure in patients with COVID-19 was associated with a higher risk of in-hospital death or orotracheal intubation. These findings suggest that patients with a history of heart failure, particularly heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, should be considered at high risk of clinical deterioration.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , COVID-19/blood , Comorbidity , Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic , Female , France/epidemiology , Heart Failure/blood , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Intubation, Intratracheal/statistics & numerical data , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stroke Volume , Treatment Outcome
4.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 114(5): 394-406, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1240129

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although women account for up to half of patients hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), no specific data have been reported in this population. AIMS: To assess the burden and impact of cardiovascular comorbidities in women with COVID-19. METHODS: All consecutive patients hospitalized for COVID-19 across 24 hospitals from 26 February to 20 April 2020 were included. The primary composite outcome was transfer to an intensive care unit or in-hospital death. RESULTS: Among 2878 patients, 1212 (42.1%) were women. Women were older (68.3±18.0 vs. 65.4±16.0 years; P<0.001), but had less prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities than men. Among women, 276 (22.8%) experienced the primary outcome, including 161 (13.3%) transfers to an intensive care unit and 115 (9.5%) deaths without transfer to intensive care unit. The rate of in-hospital death or transfer to an intensive care unit was lower in women versus men (crude hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.53-0.72). Age (adjusted HR: 1.05 per 5-year increase, 95% CI: 1.01-1.10), body mass index (adjusted HR: 1.06 per 2-unit increase, 95% CI: 1.02-1.10), chronic kidney disease (adjusted HR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.11-2.22) and heart failure (adjusted HR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.04-2.22) were independently associated with the primary outcome in women. Elevated B-type natriuretic peptide/N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide (adjusted HR: 2.41, 95% CI: 1.70-3.44) and troponin (adjusted HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.39-2.88) concentrations at admission were also associated with the primary outcome, even in women free of previous coronary artery disease or heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: Although female sex was associated with a lower risk of transfer to an intensive care unit or in-hospital death, COVID-19 remained associated with considerable morbimortality in women, especially in those with cardiovascular diseases.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Aged , Asthma/epidemiology , Biomarkers , Cardiovascular Diseases/blood , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Smoking/epidemiology , Troponin/blood
5.
Nephrol Ther ; 17(4): 233-244, 2021 Aug.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1174436

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 pandemic hits the French transplant population on March 3, 2020. Very quickly, a French registry was set up on behalf of the French Society of Transplantation allowing the collection of confirmed cases of Covid-19 occurring in kidney transplant recipients in almost all French centers. The analysis of this registry in conjunction with the data from the Agence de la Biomédecine (Cristal) has enabled us to obtain instructive results. We first showed that the incidence of severe forms among transplant patients hospitalized for Covid-19 was 46% and that their mortality was 22.8%. The risk factors for severe forms and mortality are described. Then we showed, by comparing transplant patients with immunocompetent patients matched for the main severity factors of the disease, that mortality among transplant patients was higher (17.9% vs 11.4%; P<0.001). In multivariate analysis, a creatinine level at admission above 115 µmol/L was associated with death, whereas being transplanted was not. Finally, comparing the transplant cohort with patients on the kidney transplant waiting list during the period from February to June 2020, we found that patients on the waiting list had a higher Covid-19-related excess mortality than transplant patients, mainly in areas of low viral circulation. In conclusion, the French Registry of transplant patients with Covid-19, which was rapidly set up at the beginning of the epidemic, has already enabled us to draw several lessons about this initially unknown infection, particularly in kidney transplant patients, a population which appeared to be particularly at risk.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , Kidney Transplantation , Transplant Recipients , Aged , Creatinine/analysis , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Waiting Lists
6.
Arch Cardiovasc Dis ; 114(5): 352-363, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1116247

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a public health crisis. Only limited data are available on the characteristics and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. AIMS: To investigate the characteristics, cardiovascular complications and outcomes of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France. METHODS: The Critical COVID-19 France (CCF) study is a French nationwide study including all consecutive adults with a diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) infection hospitalized in 24 centres between 26 February and 20 April 2020. Patients admitted directly to intensive care were excluded. Clinical, biological and imaging parameters were systematically collected at hospital admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. RESULTS: Of 2878 patients included (mean±SD age 66.6±17.0 years, 57.8% men), 360 (12.5%) died in the hospital setting, of which 7 (20.7%) were transferred to intensive care before death. The majority of patients had at least one (72.6%) or two (41.6%) cardiovascular risk factors, mostly hypertension (50.8%), obesity (30.3%), dyslipidaemia (28.0%) and diabetes (23.7%). In multivariable analysis, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.06; P<0.001), male sex (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.11-2.57; P=0.01), diabetes (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.12-2.63; P=0.01), chronic kidney failure (HR 1.57, 95% CI 1.02-2.41; P=0.04), elevated troponin (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11-2.49; P=0.01), elevated B-type natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.0004-2.86; P=0.049) and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score ≥2 (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.12-2.60; P=0.01) were independently associated with in-hospital death. CONCLUSIONS: In this large nationwide cohort of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in France, cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors were associated with a substantial morbi-mortality burden.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Dyslipidemias/epidemiology , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Hypertension/epidemiology , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
7.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 110(3): 141-142, 2021.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1114688

ABSTRACT

CME/Answers: Hypertension and the COVID-19 Pandemic: What to Consider in Medical Practice Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic represents a major public health problem. A fraction of the population is at increased risk of developing complications of this disease, in particular older subjects as well as diabetic, obese and hypertensive patients. With regard to patients with high blood pressure, the existence of an increased risk remains to be confirmed in large controlled trials. So far the findings regarding this question are reassuring, whether these patients are treated or not. There seems to be no reason to worry when using blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. The observations available to date suggest that COVID-19 vaccine can be administered safely to hypertensive patients. In conclusion, there is no reason to implement changes in the care of hypertensive patients due to the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Pandemics , Renin-Angiotensin System , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 110(2): 60-64, 2021 Feb.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1084605

ABSTRACT

CME: Hypertension and the COVID-19 Pandemic: What to Consider in Medical Practice Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic represents a major public health problem. A fraction of the population is at increased risk of developing complications of this disease, in particular older subjects as well as diabetic, obese and hypertensive patients. With regard to patients with high blood pressure, the existence of an increased risk remains to be confirmed in large controlled trials. So far the findings regarding this question are reassuring, whether these patients are treated or not. There seems to be no reason to worry when using blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. The observations available to date suggest that COVID-19 vaccine can be administered safely to hypertensive patients. In conclusion, there is no reason to implement changes in the care of hypertensive patients due to the pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Pandemics , Renin-Angiotensin System , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Praxis (Bern 1994) ; 110(2): 1-5, 2021 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1061211

ABSTRACT

CME: Hypertension and the COVID-19 Pandemic: What to Consider in Medical Practice Abstract. The COVID-19 pandemic represents a major public health problem. A fraction of the population is at increased risk of developing complications of this disease, in particular older subjects as well as diabetic, obese and hypertensive patients. With regard to patients with high blood pressure, the existence of an increased risk remains to be confirmed in large controlled trials. So far the findings regarding this question are reassuring, whether these patients are treated or not. There seems to be no reason to worry when using blockers of the renin-angiotensin system. The observations available to date suggest that COVID-19 vaccine can be administered safely to hypertensive patients. In conclusion, there is no reason to implement changes in the care of hypertensive patients due to the pandemic.


Résumé. La pandémie COVID-19 représente un problème de santé publique majeur. Une partie de la population est à risque accru de développer des complications de cette maladie, en particulier les personnes âgées ainsi que les malades diabétiques, les obèses et, possiblement, les malades hypertendus. Pour ces derniers, cela reste à être confirmé dans des études contrôlées de grande envergure. Les connaissances accumulées à ce jour sont rassurantes, que les malades soient traités ou non. Il n'y a pas de crainte à avoir en ce qui concerne la prise de médicaments antihypertenseurs, y compris les bloqueurs du système rénine-angiotensine. Les premières observations indiquent que le vaccin anti-COVID-19 peut être administré chez le malade hypertendu avec la meme efficacité que le normotendu. En conclusion il n'y a pas de raison de prendre en charge le malade hypertendu autrement qu'avant l'apparition de la pandémie.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hypertension , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/pharmacology , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Pandemics , Renin-Angiotensin System , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL